|
HARVARD GAZETTE ARCHIVES
Panel Addresses the Wage Gap
Social-change experts offer ideas for action
By Alvin Powell
Contributing Writer

Professor Robert Reich of Brandeis University (above) and William Julius
Wilson (below), Geyser Professor at Harvard, speak about low wages at a
panel at the Kennedy School of Government. Photos by Marc Halevi.
|
A federal budget surplus and prosperous times have created an
opportunity to train and educate low-wage workers and address the
wage gap between the working poor and the rest of the work force,
panelists at a Kennedy School of Government Institute of Politics
Forum said Monday, April 19.
Each of the three panelists issued his or her own call for action,
ranging from a broad-based coalition to force Congress to act on
social issues to state programs for struggling Massachusetts families.
Whether local or national, the panelists agreed there is not just
the opportunity but the need for action now.
"Because we don't have the basic family and social
supports, families are struggling," said Geyser University
Professor William Julius Wilson. "I think now is the time for
progressives to begin organizing."
In addition to Wilson, the panel included former Clinton Labor
Secretary Robert Reich, who is now university professor and Maurice
B. Hexter Professor of Social and Economic Policy at Brandeis
University's Heller Graduate School, and Sister Margaret
Leonard, executive director of Project Hope in Boston's
Dorchester section. Julie Wilson, director of the Kennedy
School's Malcolm Wiener Center for Social Policy, moderated the
event.
Wilson provided the backdrop for the discussion, describing a
labor market that over the past few decades has left low-skilled
workers further and further behind. Wilson said the increasing
demand for computer skills, the flow of low-skilled jobs overseas,
and the decline of union membership have combined to
"twist" the U.S. labor market against low-skilled workers.
Though low unemployment has prompted recent wage increases
for this group, those gains will likely prove temporary when the
economy slows down, Wilson said.
"There is little reason to assume their long-term prospects
are anything but bleak," Wilson said.
Wilson issued a strong call for a broad-based coalition to mount a
political offensive to convince Congress that the time is now to take
action on this issue.
Reich issued his own call to action with a seven-point plan to
improve the lot of low-skilled workers.
The plan includes improved education and job training, better
child and health care, public service jobs for those unable to find
private sector work, improved public transportation, a minimum
wage hike, an interest rate cut to heat up the economy, and reforms
to make unionization easier for service-industry workers.
Reich said the programs are possible today because of federal
budget surpluses "as far as the eye can see."
"We are not bereft of policy alternatives. There is no reason
for denial and resignation," Reich said.
Drawing on her experience helping poor families, Leonard put a
human face on the discussion. She described people who got up and
went to work every day -- to jobs as bank tellers and security
guards -- and who nonetheless became homeless.
These members of the working poor are the ones who tend to fall
through the cracks, Leonard said, because their incomes are high
enough to make them ineligible for many government programs yet
too low for them to save enough to get through a crisis like a job loss.
Leonard described case after case where these families, after
getting help from the right government program, went on to gain
more education and secure better jobs.
The problem, she said, is there are not enough programs aimed at
this group, which needs job training, education, child care, and health
care. Leonard said there are several programs being advocated in the
Massachusetts legislature by the Women's Educational and
Industrial Union, including tax cuts, that would begin to address the
problems faced by this group.
The Forum was attended by about 200 people, including several
members of the Harvard Living Wage Campaign, which is pushing
Harvard to adopt a %10-an-hour minimum wage for its workers
and those of its subcontractors. During the question and answer
period, one student asked whether action should start close to home,
rather than in Washington. Reich responded that some action at
Harvard would be fine, but said the federal government affects so
much of our lives that change at the federal level is crucial.
James Koshiba, a student at the Kennedy School, said after the
Forum that he enjoyed the discussion's mix of policy, politics,
and personal stories.
"Since we're in an era of prosperity, we should be
making better social policy," Koshiba said. "I hope people
heard that."
The program was sponsored by the Wiener Center, the Kennedy
School, the Kennedy School's Social Policy PIC, the Harvard
University Trade Union Program, the Women's Educational and
Industrial Union, and the Institute of Politics' Student Advisory
Committee.
Copyright
1999 President and Fellows of Harvard College
|