|
HARVARD GAZETTE ARCHIVES
Six Top Teachers Honored with Harvard College Professorships
By Alvin Powell
Contributing Writer
Good teaching may be tough to quantify -- it's part
personality, part performance art, part mind reading -- but it's
easy to recognize, and the Faculty of Arts and Sciences has done just
that in naming six outstanding undergraduate teachers to Harvard
College Professorships.
The honor was established last year and rewards Harvard's
great teachers with a five-year chair that contributes to the
recipients' professional development with either a semester of
paid leave, commensurate summer pay, or an equivalent fund to
support their scholarly work.
This year's recipients are Professor of Chinese History
Peter Bol; John Dowling, the Maria Moors Cabot
Professor of the Natural Sciences; Eric Mazur, the Gordon
McKay Professor of Applied Physics and professor of physics;
Professor of Government Michael Sandel; Richard
Tarrant, the Pope Professor of the Latin Language and
Literature; and Professor of Sociology Mary Waters.
The professorships were established through a gift from John L.
Loeb, SB '24, LLD '71 (hon.), and Frances Lehman Loeb.
The Faculty of Arts and Sciences will announce several chairs each
year until 24 are serving at any one time. Five professors were
honored last year, the program's first.
"Many universities give prizes to their committed teachers,
and at one, the president presents popular professors with an
apple," said Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences Jeremy R.
Knowles. "In this Faculty, thanks to the generosity of John and
Frances Loeb, we reward our most inspiring and dedicated teachers
more tangibly. I am very happy to recognize the great contributions
of Harvard College Professors to the educational experience of
undergraduates in the College."
Selections are made based on several criteria, including student
ratings of individual professors, section and tutorial teaching,
advising of senior theses or research projects, and service on
committees that help with undergraduate education, according to
William Todd, dean of undergraduate education in the Faculty of Arts
and Sciences.
Todd said the honor is important because it shows that Harvard
values the teaching of its faculty as much as their research and
scholarship.
"It signals to the faculty, the students, and to the world
outside that we value not only research, but also teaching,"
Todd said. "It also reinforces the link between great teaching
and great research by rewarding our great teachers with the
opportunity to move ahead with their research, which made them
inspiring teachers in the first place."
The Recipients
Professor of Chinese History Peter Bol uses several tactics
to keep tabs on how his students are faring, but it all boils down to
paying attention.
One year, he said, students began applauding at the end of every
lecture. After the habit was established, however, the students were
too polite not to applaud when they didn't understand or when
a lecture bombed. But, Bol said, he could tell how the lecture went
just by how vigorously the students clapped at the end.
Today, the clapping is over, but Bol still tracks his students,
gauging their responses by their faces. He said it helps to be a bit of a
perfectionist.
"I always worry I'm not getting across. I always
suspect they are not following the thread. I always know I need to
do better," Bol said. "In the end, however, it really does
require having learned something interesting that you believe the
audience will want to hear about."
Maria Moors Cabot Professor of Natural Sciences John
Dowling's commitment to undergraduate education
extended far beyond the classroom for the 17 years he served as
Master of Leverett House, a post he retired from last year. Though he
is no longer Leverett Master, Dowling's commitment to
undergraduate education hasn't wavered.
Dowling has taught science to large lecture halls of
undergraduates for years, and has worked with hundreds of
undergraduates and graduate students in his research lab, where he
studies the vertebrate retina. Dowling describes his teaching style as
a bit old-fashioned, with extensive use of the blackboard. But he
strives to ensure that at the end of each lecture, students really
understand the subject of the day.
"I've enjoyed undergraduates very much over the
years, watching them grow," Dowling said. "It extends not
just to residential life, but to research. I've had more than 100
postdoctoral, graduate, and undergraduate students through this
lab."
Dowling said he tunes into things like background noise and
shuffling papers to tell when he's not reaching students and
tries to use question-and-answer formats to keep students engaged.
"You monitor faces," he said, adding that the trick is to
pick the right faces. "Some look bored all the time --
they're no good [to use as a gauge]; others are enthusiastic all
the time -- they're also no good."
Gordon McKay Professor of Applied Physics and Professor of
Physics Eric Mazur said his current teaching style is the
result of an epiphany several years ago. He'd been teaching
physics to undergraduates for six years when he discovered that,
though his students were very good at using formulas and plugging
in the right values to come out with the right answers, they really
didn't understand the concepts underlying the formulas.
It was a bit of a shock, Mazur confesses, and caused him to begin
to search for ways to spark that broader understanding. The answer
came not from increased order in his teaching, but from chaos, he
says.
Mazur has adopted a read-first-lecture-second style in which he
doesn't repeat the reading during his lectures, but instead tries
to gauge what students didn't understand in the reading and fill
in the gaps.
One of the ways he finds the gaps is by giving the students
questions that test the students' conceptual, rather than
mathematical, understanding of the principles of physics.
An example is a problem of a boat with a rock in it floating on a
lake. If the rock is tossed into the water, what happens to the
lake's water level?
Mazur will throw the question out and let students hash out the
answer. He then lets the students try to convince each other that
their answer is right. Invariably, Mazur said, the students with the
right answer will convince the others until a sizable majority agree
on the answer. The method provides a good way of getting feedback
as well, Mazur said, because if more students support the wrong
answer, it means he has more explaining to do.
"The amazing thing is the students who are right invariably
convince those who are wrong. Maybe they should get the
award," Mazur said. "I consider myself a coach more than
a teacher. I've given up trying to pour knowledge into
students' heads."
Professor of Government Michael Sandel has long
taught one of Harvard's most popular fall semester courses,
Moral Reasoning 22: Justice.
In Justice, Sandel challenges 700 to 900 students with texts
by Aristotle, Locke, and Kant and with arguments about topics
relevant today, such as affirmative action, income distribution, and
the difficult balance of free speech versus hate speech.
Sandel, who is on leave this semester, has previously been singled
out for recognition of his teaching skills. In 1985, Sandel was
awarded the Harvard-Radcliffe Phi Beta Kappa Teaching Prize and, in
1987, he was singled out by Insight magazine as one of
"nine great teachers" in a survey of U.S. college
professors.
Sandel said the large class size actually helps foster learning. So
many students are reading the same texts and wrestling with the
same moral dilemmas, he said, the discussion continues outside the
classroom.
"My job is to provoke the discussions and give them some
structure," Sandel said. "The Justice course is built
around argument. Students find it exhilarating, if somewhat risky, to
subject their moral and political convictions to critical examination.
We engage the philosophical texts, not as relics in the history of
ideas, but as episodes in arguments in which we are still
engaged."
Pope Professor of the Latin Language and Literature Richard
Tarrant said he feels lucky to be teaching the giants of classical
literature, whose writings have had a profound impact on modern
culture, to today's students. And Tarrant's excitement and
enthusiasm help keep students involved and interested. He also
spurs students to discussion about the writings, making them
"collaborators in a joint enterprise of interpretation."
Tarrant said his teaching and research complement each other. In
producing editions and commentaries of primary texts, Tarrant is
constantly looking for new ideas and interpretations of the classic
works. Those same ideas and interpretations can then be introduced
in the classroom. Classroom discussion can, in turn, spark new ideas.
"As for the stimulus of teaching, I can think of no better way
to keep my ideas fresh and to advance in understanding,"
Tarrant said. "I feel most excited about going into a class when
preparing for it has enabled me to see something I hadn't
noticed before or to make a connection I hadn't realized could
be made. Being open to new ideas about familiar texts makes it more
likely that fresh insights will emerge in the class discussion itself,
and that's the most exciting thing of all for a teacher."
Teaching runs in the family for Sociology Professor Mary
Waters. Not only is she the child of two college professors, but
four of her seven brothers and sisters are also educators. Waters said
she's always felt at home in the classroom and says she stays in
touch with the students by talking to them to find out which teaching
techniques work and which don't.
A key element, though, she said, is maintaining her enthusiasm
for her subject. She continues to incorporate new readings and new
topics, and to introduce issues and problems that she doesn't
necessarily have answers to.
"The main thing I have found over the years is that if I am
excited and engaged with the material, the class usually goes well
and if I am bored the students know it and are bored, too,"
Waters said.
Waters added that it is important for Harvard to recognize
excellence in teaching because the recognition puts teaching on a par
with research and other scholarly activities.
"I know that Harvard has many, many wonderful teachers
and advisers, so for me to be singled out is truly an honor, and one
that was very unexpected," Waters said.
Copyright
1999 President and Fellows of Harvard College
|